Left versus Right

Politics

	Left	Right
preffered society type	anarchy (organic, informal hierarchy, based on personal merits): social-democracy	hierarchy (imposed, formal, based on servitute / duty / devotion / fear / gratitude / veneration): fascism / "comunism" (stalinism / leninism, authoritharianism), capitalism
power belongs to the	community, democracy, people	authoritarian lider, government (police, army, riot police), church, oligarchy, big corporations
atitude towards police	against	for
preffered state type	cultural, inclusive, equally treated individuals, equal rights	national, exclusive, national majority vs. minorities; defines minorities that are considered inferior, using etnical or anatomical or physiological or religios criteria
external politics	alliances, cooperation	imperialist, domination
distribution of power	descentralised, federal, "grass roots", the government and companies are dedicated to the citizen	centralised, powerful lider, the citizen is dedicated to the government or company
violence against	obiects symbols of hierarchical power of the state (Antifa) or formal hierarchy of any kind: political (civil disobedience), economical (distruction of shops and businesses), colonial (statues, history revisionism to account for the colony's opinion), symbols revisionism to get them in accordance with the historical truth (dark skin Jesus)	inferior classes: workers, women, lgbtq+, imigrants, the poor, minorities in general (fascism / nationalism (nazism) / rasism homofoby) - atacks people (imigrants, people belonging to other ethnic, rasial, sexual, religious groups)
regulations to protect the population and the environment (policing of entities in power: political and economical economical enitites)	yes	no
regulations, other than those above (regulation of intimate life, abortion - policing of population)	no	yes
promoted social structure	extended family, community: "together we are strong"	individual, traditional nuclear family, fragmented community: "divide et impera"
freedom	positive: personal freedoms, that does not include rights over other people, anarchic	negative: freedoms of one over another, hierarchic (the right to own property = the right to own slaves, free speech = the right to mislead and to manipulate)
attitude towards the electoral process	inclusion (wants to make sure that everyone is exercising this right)	exclusion (wants to make sure that the undesirables do not exercise right, by changing or breaking the electoral law); the general population is mostly Leftist, because in a hierarchy most are at the bottom of the pyramid; however, among the majority we can find: 1. "useful idiots" that belive the Right's propaganda becuse of a lack of education, 2. "alt-right", that has sadistic interests, 3. the "middle class" or the "small burgoisie" that has risen (maybe with the help of their parents) from the lower class (well payed employees, medical doctors, lawyers, small business owners, etc.) and that hope to rise more, into the ruling class of big business and aristocracy
for violence they blame	the aggressor	the victim
in exercising one's rights, the priority is the freedom of	the other	one's own
the whole system is rigged - the mania of persecution (e.g. philosophers find excuses to bring islam into our country or to let the brown people walk freely and vote; studies demonstrate Leftist values are more prevalent because they are rigged and bought, etc.), so the liar is seen as the most authentic (Trump is lying to remain in power); the behaviour of people, regardless of their role in the society, have a hidden agenda (conspiracy theory)	no	yes
populism	anti: economic elite (99% vs. 1%); pro: cancelling of economic inequalities.	anti: ethnic (immigrants vs. natives); religious (true belivers vs. atheists) minorities; educated / urban elites; globalisation; pro: immigrant deportation; make the nation great and pure through traditions and by bringing back blue collar jobs.

Economics

	Left	Right
wealth distribution	anarchical: commune / socialist / communist	hierarchical: "communist" (stalinism, maoism, etc.), capitalist, feudalist, slavery (those at the top of the hierarchy have the most wealth)
attitude towards resources	socialisation / sharing (coop)	privatisation / grabbing (company: local king over the means of production)
attitude towards people with special needs	empathy	disdain
social services	public, generally available	private, missing, available on economical or political grounds
inflation	for	against
comercial organisation type	coop	company
they are for funding of	social inclusion and help groups (NGOs), open source projects, independent journalism	discrimination and hate groups (religious groups, "pro-life" groups, anti-LGBTQ+), propaganda media that serves the interests of the group
attitude towards the ownership right over natural resources (land, forests, mineral resources, etc.)	against	for
attitude towards profitting off of someone else's labour	against	for
attitude towards profiting off of people's needs (private medical services, private medical insurance, where gathered funds are divided between costs and profit)	against	for
minimum wage / universal basic income	for	against
attitudine towards environmental issues	interrested	not interrested
when the law is not clear enough, fall back to ethics	yes	no
financial free market (any financial institution has equal rights with any other financial institution)	against (regulation for local institutions to not use the currency of another country)	for
products free market (any products / services can be on the market from any country or producer)	against (regulations (a.k.a. taxes) for protecting local companies and work force)	for
labour free market (anyone can get hired anywhere by anyone else, according to his / her abilities)	for	against (regulations for accepting foreign workers that are payed smaller salaries and work in worse conditions, as contractors)
attitude towards people's health and towards the environment	health and the environment are above profits	profits are above health and the environment (see Schweighofer-Holzindustrie, Dupont, Daraprim, Tönnies, etc. cases) - treat lower class people (the workers, the poor) as disposable (self-replenishing resource) and they are painted as the source of criminality; child labour, people traficking, trading weapons and drugs for profit - they don't bow to the Law because they "are covered" (coruption)
who is to blame for social inequality	resource grabbing by those in power (politically or economically), right-wing propaganda and lack of access to free education, heathcare and higiene, shelter and food; building a system that favours those who have the luck to be born in famillies that can afford	shift the blame on the powerless to defend themselves from these accusations: imigrants; workers that "are not intelligent enough to pull themselves up from their own bootstraps and to take risks and they are lazy"
taxes	yes, "they finance the public sector: social services, infrastructure, etc."	no, "taxes are theft: why should the government do it, when I can do it myself and make some profit?"
public-private partnership (public contracts)	no: "it's theft from public funds, corruption"	yes: "public funds must fund private enterprises, that make profit a % of the allocated funds"
intelectual property licensing	copyright	copyleft

Social / Personality

	Left	Right
opinion leader	scientific consensus, humanist values	group leader
priority	humanity / life	ideology
social relationships	cooperation: "together we are strong"	competition: "divide et impera"
relationship with the out-group	inclusion	exclusion (discrimination)
attitudine towards new	interest, progresism	fear, conservative
default behaviour	friendly (diplomacy)	suspicion (conflictual, combativity)
conflict resolution	diplomacy	by force, violence
empathy	yes	in-group only, limited
religiosity	no	yes
value system base, base features	cooperation, humanist philosophy, science, non-hierarchical, empathy, altruism, socialism, courage, anarchy	competitivity, nationalism, rasism, religion, hierarchic, lack of empathy / sadism, fear, egocentrism (egoism), individualism, authoritarism
respect	gains	claims
problems / conflict	solves	creates
violence out of the pleasure to affirm his/her authority	no	yes
social justice narrative	fighting for the weak (alfa male)	fighting for his/her own or group leader power statute (beta male)
parenting attitude	reward, cooperation	punishment, spying: helicopter
language	literary, restrained	unrestrained, violent
grammar (weak correlation?)	grammar-nazi	lax
honesty	yes, "has a spine", learns for exams	lies (mostly through omission, but also through "alternate facts") if the facts or the available data do not serve his/her own interrests; frauds exams
morality / ethics	yes	no
when lacking power	has dignity (does not accept the hierarchy, is anarchist)	servile / subservient (he/she knows his/her place, but he/she wants to be in the graces of the lider with the hidden agenda of taking his/her place one day; deceitful: at the right moment he/she strikes to grab the power (is biting the hand that fed him/her))
predisposition to conspiracy theories (belives, spreads, produces)	no	yes
healthy habits	yes	no (thinks he/she's invincible)
fitness + proteins	no	yes (wants to physically impose)
borderline sociopathology	no	yes
opulence	no	yes
in case of humiliation he/she is	brave	coward
adaptability / assimilation	yes	no
neuroticism	no	yes
narcissism	no	yes
while talking about the reality uses	the truth	the art of lying
purpose in life	build civilisation	become or stay rich and powerful
knows when others are joking	yes	no
future prediction accuracy (follows from progresivism / conservatism)	good	awful
the logic of thinking	based on scientific evidence or progresist ideology	based on belifs and superstitions or conservative ideology

Notes

A feature of the Rightwing that I cannot frame yet, but that belongs to maintaining the status-quo for conservative resons, is if they have a debate that put certain terms in a negative light (nationalism, religion) they are trying to muddy the waters and apease the audience with a conciliatory attitude: "let's discuss, let's find the middle ground". The middle ground is not always possible, especially when opinions and facts are treated as equal, or when we have a choice between stagnation and evolution. Another problem with the Right is that they get very defensive when debating the economic ideology. This defensiveness has its origin in Francis Fukuyama's declaration that was saying that "history is over" and that capitalism is the ultimate solution for the economy. The Right does not accept any change in the functioning of the economy.

Clarifications

Inflation:: The government can create wealth by injecting money into the market, if those money go directly to consumers. This creates a problem for those storing wealth in bank accounts, because the value of money decreases.

Freedom:

Freedom - Cass Sunstein - talk show with David Pakman
Pozitive and negative freedom

Extremism vs. Radicalism

Extremism is the movement to push the status quo towards the current ideology's extreme.
Radicalism is the movement to push the status quo towards the current ideology's oposite by implementing fast / shock / radical changes, all at once.

Centre: At the Centre we find those who do not agree with te Right's authoritarianism, but favour Right-wing economic policies and Left-wing social rethoric (but not policies, which they tend to favour the Right's). In character they adopt deceit: their narrative is somewhat Left-wing, but their policy is of small steps, in order not to step on businesses' interests toes.

Other political spectrum theories: Plotting political positions on a Cartezian system, the economical and political axes respectively, or even adopting a multidimentional system is incorrect, as those axes can individually be considered as a left - right axis, because it is clear that the positions on those axes emerge from the base charateristics of the left - right axis, so these are derivative characteristics. It is also erroneous to consider extremisms being identical on those multiple axes, that would lead to the curbing of those axes, such that the extreme left would touch the extreme right, in a horseshoe shape. Those two extremes are fundametally different on all their aspects. The extreme left is 100% the opposite of the extreme right.